Investigate ads first
extreme · 76.7% of this app’s 43 negative reviews, against 10.7% typical store-wide.
How it compares
- this app
- 76.7%
- 33 of 43
- its shelf
- 23.3%
- rivals only
- store-wide
- 10.7%
- typical
Christie Clark
4.85star258,091 ratings
Counted from real App Store reviews · 2026-08-24 · nothing estimated or modelled
5.0out of 5
258,183 ratings · Apple’s own count, fetched daily
extreme · 76.7% of this app’s 43 negative reviews, against 10.7% typical store-wide.
elevated · 4.7% of this app’s 43 negative reviews, against 2.9% typical store-wide.
n = 2. Too thin to act on — we recount weekly.
Billing, Performance all run well below the store’s typical rate.
n = 3. Too thin to act on — we recount weekly.
All 9 panel members · 2026-08-24 snapshot.
| App | Ratings | Ads |
|---|---|---|
| 409,091 | 81.3% | |
| 258,091 | 76.7% | |
| 1,727,468 | 29.2% | |
| 52,412 | 21.5% | |
| 28,867 | 18.1% | |
| 24,956 | 13.7% | |
| 83,430 | 12.3% | |
| 6,140 | 10% | |
| 9,726 | 9.4% |
Every complaint across calculator apps, frequency-ranked from real App Store reviews — the gaps nobody on this shelf has fixed.
Read the calculator apps reportEvery number is arithmetic over the reviews we hold, re-counted weekly — nothing modelled, nothing scored. Themes come from a frozen pattern classifier rather than a model reading reviews, so the same review always lands in the same bucket. Shares are of this app’s own recent negative reviews; the shelf figure is its rivals with this app excluded. The graded words have fixed cutoffs against the store’s typical rate: elevated from 1.15, high from 2, extreme from 3.5 times it. The page says what is broken and how it compares — never how to fix it, and never whether this app can win.