Investigate support first
high · 23.2% of this app’s 461 negative reviews, against 9.2% typical store-wide.
How it compares
- this app
- 23.2%
- 107 of 461
- its shelf
- 7.3%
- rivals only
- store-wide
- 9.2%
- typical
Viral Development LLC
4.80star358,421 ratings
Counted from real App Store reviews · 2026-08-24 · nothing estimated or modelled
Read those two together. Ratings are cumulative, reviews are recent — a 4.80star average beside 66% negative is the finding, not an error.
high · 23.2% of this app’s 461 negative reviews, against 9.2% typical store-wide.
elevated · 59.4% of this app’s 461 negative reviews, against 32.1% typical store-wide.
elevated · 3% of this app’s 461 negative reviews, against 2.2% typical store-wide.
elevated · 15.4% of this app’s 461 negative reviews, against 13.2% typical store-wide.
Performance, UX all run at or below the store’s typical rate.
Accuracy is left out — the theme’s vocabulary is in this app’s own name.
All 10 panel members · 2026-08-24 snapshot.
| App | Ratings | Support |
|---|---|---|
| 358,421 | 23.2% | |
| 53,553 | 14.3% | |
| 21,211 | 8.4% | |
| 96,800 | 7.4% | |
| 37,248 | 7.2% | |
| 150,515 | 6.8% | |
| 773,219 | 5.4% | |
| 2,352,679 | 5.3% | |
| 162,875 | 3.5% | |
| 72 | 0% |
Every complaint across calorie tracking, frequency-ranked from real App Store reviews — the gaps nobody on this shelf has fixed.
Read the calorie tracking reportEvery number is arithmetic over the reviews we hold, re-counted weekly — nothing modelled, nothing scored. Themes come from a frozen pattern classifier rather than a model reading reviews, so the same review always lands in the same bucket. Shares are of this app’s own recent negative reviews; the shelf figure is its rivals with this app excluded. The graded words have fixed cutoffs against the store’s typical rate: elevated from 1.15, high from 2, extreme from 3.5 times it. The page says what is broken and how it compares — never how to fix it, and never whether this app can win.