Skip to content

Duplicate Cleaner App-Softices

Softices Consultancy Private Limited

4.70star3,406 ratings

UtilitiesDuplicate photo cleaner app shelfNo in-app purchasesUpdated Aug 6, 2026
Biggest complaint · Accuracy
9.1%
2 of 22 negatives · store typical 11.5%
Recent reviews negative
39%
its 9 shelf rivals run 55% · 57 reviews held

Counted from real App Store reviews · 2026-08-24 · nothing estimated or modelled

Duplicate Cleaner App-Softices — App Store screenshot
Duplicate Cleaner App-Softices — App Store screenshot
Duplicate Cleaner App-Softices — App Store screenshot
Duplicate Cleaner App-Softices — App Store screenshot

Ratings.

4.5out of 5

3,406 ratings · Apple’s own count, fetched daily

5star2,838
4star328
3star120
2star35
1star85

3 decisions.

01

Accuracy is at typical — skip it

9.1% of this app’s 22 negative reviews, against 11.5% typical store-wide, which is normal for the store.

n = 2. Too thin to act on — we recount weekly.

How it compares
this app
9.1%
2 of 22
its shelf
7.5%
rivals only
store-wide
11.5%
typical
02

Watch ux — recount before acting

elevated · 4.5% of this app’s 22 negative reviews, against 2.9% typical store-wide.

n = 1. Too thin to act on — we recount weekly.

How it compares
this app
4.5%
1 of 22
its shelf
1.1%
rivals only
store-wide
2.9%
typical
03

Protect billing, login & auth and ads

Billing, Login & auth, Ads all run well below the store’s typical rate.

n = 3. Too thin to act on — we recount weekly.

How it compares
  • Billing4.5% of 22 · shelf 44.3% · store 32.1%
  • Login & auth4.5% of 22 · shelf 2.3% · store 13.2%
  • Ads4.5% of 22 · shelf 10.9% · store 10.7%

Performance is left out — the theme’s vocabulary is in this app’s own name.

The shelf in numbers

All 10 panel members · 2026-08-24 snapshot.

The whole shelf, counted

Every complaint across duplicate photo cleaner app, frequency-ranked from real App Store reviews — the gaps nobody on this shelf has fixed.

Read the duplicate photo cleaner app report
How this is counted

Every number is arithmetic over the reviews we hold, re-counted weekly — nothing modelled, nothing scored. Themes come from a frozen pattern classifier rather than a model reading reviews, so the same review always lands in the same bucket. Shares are of this app’s own recent negative reviews; the shelf figure is its rivals with this app excluded. The graded words have fixed cutoffs against the store’s typical rate: elevated from 1.15, high from 2, extreme from 3.5 times it. The page says what is broken and how it compares — never how to fix it, and never whether this app can win.