Investigate ux first
extreme · 11.3% of this app’s 141 negative reviews, against 2.9% typical store-wide.
How it compares
- this app
- 11.3%
- 16 of 141
- its shelf
- 2.6%
- rivals only
- store-wide
- 2.9%
- typical
Goodreads, Inc
4.82star747,877 ratings
Counted from real App Store reviews · 2026-08-24 · nothing estimated or modelled
5.0out of 5
748,362 ratings · Apple’s own count, fetched daily
extreme · 11.3% of this app’s 141 negative reviews, against 2.9% typical store-wide.
elevated · 23.4% of this app’s 141 negative reviews, against 16.9% typical store-wide.
elevated · 3.5% of this app’s 141 negative reviews, against 2.2% typical store-wide.
Ads, Login & auth all run at or below the store’s typical rate.
Billing, Limits & caps, Support all run well below the store’s typical rate.
n = 14. Too thin to act on — we recount weekly.
Accuracy is left out — the theme’s vocabulary is in this app’s own name.
All 11 panel members · 2026-08-24 snapshot.
| App | Ratings | UX |
|---|---|---|
| 16,071 | 18.2% | |
| 747,877 | 11.3% | |
| 87,192 | 5% | |
| 705,970 | 3.3% | |
| 9,632 | 2.8% | |
| 36,575 | 2.3% | |
| 3,305 | 2.1% | |
| 518,633 | 1.3% | |
| 287,824 | 0% | |
| 1,347 | 0% | |
| 10,461 | 0% |
Every complaint across books & reading, frequency-ranked from real App Store reviews — the gaps nobody on this shelf has fixed.
Read the books & reading reportEvery number is arithmetic over the reviews we hold, re-counted weekly — nothing modelled, nothing scored. Themes come from a frozen pattern classifier rather than a model reading reviews, so the same review always lands in the same bucket. Shares are of this app’s own recent negative reviews; the shelf figure is its rivals with this app excluded. The graded words have fixed cutoffs against the store’s typical rate: elevated from 1.15, high from 2, extreme from 3.5 times it. The page says what is broken and how it compares — never how to fix it, and never whether this app can win.