Investigate ux first
extreme · 11.6% of this app’s 138 negative reviews, against 2.9% typical store-wide.
How it compares
- this app
- 11.6%
- 16 of 138
- its shelf
- 2.5%
- rivals only
- store-wide
- 2.9%
- typical
Google LLC
4.63star5,249 ratings
Counted from real App Store reviews · 2026-08-24 · nothing estimated or modelled
Read those two together. Ratings are cumulative, reviews are recent — a 4.63star average beside 54% negative is the finding, not an error.
extreme · 11.6% of this app’s 138 negative reviews, against 2.9% typical store-wide.
elevated · 27.5% of this app’s 138 negative reviews, against 16.9% typical store-wide.
elevated · 20.3% of this app’s 138 negative reviews, against 11.5% typical store-wide.
elevated · 15.2% of this app’s 138 negative reviews, against 13.2% typical store-wide.
2.2% of this app’s 138 negative reviews, against 2.8% typical store-wide, which is normal for the store.
n = 3. Too thin to act on — we recount weekly.
All 10 panel members · 2026-08-24 snapshot.
| App | Ratings | UX |
|---|---|---|
| 408 | 20% | |
| 5,249 | 11.6% | |
| 19,220 | 5.1% | |
| 25,723 | 2.6% | |
| 3,710 | 1.8% | |
| 45,027 | 0% | |
| 23,523 | 0% | |
| 439 | 0% | |
| 232 | 0% | |
| 172 | 0% |
Every complaint across youtube channel analytics, frequency-ranked from real App Store reviews — the gaps nobody on this shelf has fixed.
Read the youtube channel analytics reportEvery number is arithmetic over the reviews we hold, re-counted weekly — nothing modelled, nothing scored. Themes come from a frozen pattern classifier rather than a model reading reviews, so the same review always lands in the same bucket. Shares are of this app’s own recent negative reviews; the shelf figure is its rivals with this app excluded. The graded words have fixed cutoffs against the store’s typical rate: elevated from 1.15, high from 2, extreme from 3.5 times it. The page says what is broken and how it compares — never how to fix it, and never whether this app can win.