Investigate limits & caps first
high · 5.6% of this app’s 107 negative reviews, against 2.8% typical store-wide.
How it compares
- this app
- 5.6%
- 6 of 107
- its shelf
- 2.8%
- rivals only
- store-wide
- 2.8%
- typical
ForUsApps, LLC
4.80star20,969 ratings
Counted from real App Store reviews · 2026-08-24 · nothing estimated or modelled
Read those two together. Ratings are cumulative, reviews are recent — a 4.80star average beside 48% negative is the finding, not an error.
5.0out of 5
21,023 ratings · Apple’s own count, fetched daily
high · 5.6% of this app’s 107 negative reviews, against 2.8% typical store-wide.
elevated · 52.3% of this app’s 107 negative reviews, against 32.1% typical store-wide.
Accuracy, UX, Sync & data all run at or below the store’s typical rate.
Login & auth, Support, Ads, Performance all run well below the store’s typical rate.
n = 27. Too thin to act on — we recount weekly.
All 11 panel members · 2026-08-24 snapshot.
| App | Ratings | Limits & caps |
|---|---|---|
| 45,027 | 8.3% | |
| 20,969 | 5.6% | |
| 19,220 | 5.1% | |
| 38,485 | 4.5% | |
| 36,477 | 2.8% | |
| 3,710 | 2.7% | |
| 2,255 | 2.6% | |
| 65,372 | 2.4% | |
| 25,274 | 2% | |
| 185 | 0% | |
| 2,017 | 0% |
Every complaint across tiktok creator trends analytics and growth, frequency-ranked from real App Store reviews — the gaps nobody on this shelf has fixed.
Read the tiktok creator trends analytics and growth reportEvery number is arithmetic over the reviews we hold, re-counted weekly — nothing modelled, nothing scored. Themes come from a frozen pattern classifier rather than a model reading reviews, so the same review always lands in the same bucket. Shares are of this app’s own recent negative reviews; the shelf figure is its rivals with this app excluded. The graded words have fixed cutoffs against the store’s typical rate: elevated from 1.15, high from 2, extreme from 3.5 times it. The page says what is broken and how it compares — never how to fix it, and never whether this app can win.