Investigate ads first
extreme · 77% of this app’s 87 negative reviews, against 10.7% typical store-wide.
How it compares
- this app
- 77%
- 67 of 87
- its shelf
- 9.1%
- rivals only
- store-wide
- 10.7%
- typical
Justin Patrick Silang
4.70star21,185 ratings
Counted from real App Store reviews · 2026-08-24 · nothing estimated or modelled
4.5out of 5
21,213 ratings · Apple’s own count, fetched daily
extreme · 77% of this app’s 87 negative reviews, against 10.7% typical store-wide.
elevated · 3.4% of this app’s 87 negative reviews, against 2.8% typical store-wide.
n = 3. Too thin to act on — we recount weekly.
Login & auth, Support, UX, Billing, Performance, Sync & data, Accuracy all run well below the store’s typical rate.
n = 33. Too thin to act on — we recount weekly.
All 10 panel members · 2026-08-24 snapshot.
| App | Ratings | Ads |
|---|---|---|
| 21,185 | 77% | |
| 49,067 | 16.8% | |
| 10,799 | 12.7% | |
| 4,201 | 5.9% | |
| 1,740 | 5.7% | |
| 31,550 | 3.4% | |
| 14,553 | 3% | |
| 7,494 | 2.9% | |
| 82,486 | 0% | |
| 18 | 0% |
Every complaint across pomodoro focus timer, frequency-ranked from real App Store reviews — the gaps nobody on this shelf has fixed.
Read the pomodoro focus timer reportEvery number is arithmetic over the reviews we hold, re-counted weekly — nothing modelled, nothing scored. Themes come from a frozen pattern classifier rather than a model reading reviews, so the same review always lands in the same bucket. Shares are of this app’s own recent negative reviews; the shelf figure is its rivals with this app excluded. The graded words have fixed cutoffs against the store’s typical rate: elevated from 1.15, high from 2, extreme from 3.5 times it. The page says what is broken and how it compares — never how to fix it, and never whether this app can win.