Watch billingelevated
44.6% vs 30.8% typical store-wide.
How it compares
- this app
- 44.6%
- 29 of 65
- its market
- 37%
- rivals only
- store-wide
- 30.8%
- typical
Wild: Adult Casual Dating App
Wild Limited
4.41star67,607 ratings
44.6%Billing
76%Negative reviews
Read those two together. Ratings are cumulative, reviews are recent. A 4.41star average beside 76% negative is the finding, not an error.
Ratings.
4.5out of 5
67,656 ratings · Apple’s own count, fetched daily
5star50,604
4star5,966
3star4,418
2star1,786
1star4,882
4 decisions.
Shares of this app’s 65 recent negative reviews.
Watch limits & caps. Recount before actinghigh
4.6% vs 1.9% typical store-wide.
n = 3. Too thin to act on. We recount weekly.
How it compares
- this app
- 4.6%
- 3 of 65
- its market
- 3.5%
- rivals only
- store-wide
- 1.9%
- typical
Skip support and accuracy work
Support, Accuracy all run at or below the store’s typical rate.
n = 5. Too thin to act on. We recount weekly.
How it compares
- Support6.2% of 65 · shelf 10.5% · store 7.8%
- Accuracy1.5% of 65 · shelf 0.5% · store 1.5%
Protect ads, performance and login & auth
Ads, Performance, Login & auth all run well below the store’s typical rate.
n = 5. Too thin to act on. We recount weekly.
How it compares
- Ads1.5% of 65 · shelf 1.4% · store 10.2%
- Performance3.1% of 65 · shelf 24% · store 16.3%
- Login & auth3.1% of 65 · shelf 10.1% · store 7.5%
The market in numbers
All 6 panel members · 2026-09-02 snapshot.
| App | Ratings | Billing |
|---|---|---|
 BlockerX:Adult Content Blocker | 8,235 | 60.8% |
 Adult Casual Dating App -Feel | 16,903 | 56% |
 Wild: Adult Casual Dating App | 67,607 | 44.6% |
 Feeld: Dating for the Curious | 99,476 | 40% |
 Lovense Remote | 6,803 | 15.8% |
 Erotic Adult Stories - Crave | 460 | 0% |
The whole market, counted
Every counted complaint across adult content platforms, and the gaps nobody in this market has fixed.
Read the adult content platforms reportCounted from real App Store reviews · 2026-09-02 · nothing estimated or modelled
How this is counted
Every number is arithmetic over the reviews we hold, re-counted weekly: nothing modelled, nothing scored. Themes come from a frozen pattern classifier rather than a model reading reviews, so the same review always lands in the same bucket. Shares are of this app’s own recent negative reviews; the market figure is its rivals with this app excluded. The graded words have fixed cutoffs against the store’s typical rate: elevated from 1.15, high from 2, extreme from 3.5 times it. The page says what is broken and how it compares, never how to fix it, and never whether this app can win.