Metal detecting apps
Market
Installs64.2KAcross 5 of 19 apps we could match.
- Detector Maps: 52,253 installs
- Metal Detecting Hub: 4,768 installs
- Metal Detector Map Tracker: 3,757 installs
- LuckyFind: 3,061 installs
- Ground Score Metal Detecting: 320 installs
- 81% leader share. Detector Maps, by Google Play installs, across the 5 of 19 apps we could match
- $4.49 median price. Lowest in-app price, median over the 6 apps that list one. 6 of 6 charge.
- 9 of 15 recently updated. Updated in the 30 days before 2026-10-05
Competition
Metal Detector and Spy CameraJul 202411k ratings$9.99 a year
Metal Detector EMF26 Sep2k ratings$1.99
Metal Detector & Stud Finder +Nov 2022364 ratings$14.99 a year
Metal&Gold Detector Scannernot given362 ratings$3.99 to $49.99
Detector Maps22 Sep251 ratings$59.99 to $99.99 a year
Metal&Gold Detector24 Sep216 ratings$9.99 to $49.99
LuckyFind29 Sep55 ratings
Hand Held Metal Detectornot given52 ratings
MD CompanionDec 202012 ratings
Dtecto15 Sep10 ratings
Metal Detector | Stud Finder30 Apr6 ratings
Ground Score Metal Detecting18 Feb5 ratings
Aureal14 Sep1 ratings
Metal Detectingnot given0 ratings
Metal Detecting Hub17 Sep0 ratings
Relic Hunter18 Sep0 ratings
DetectLogPronot given0 ratings
Metal Detector9 Sep0 ratings
Metal Detector Map Tracker25 May0 ratings
Reviews
What 235 reviews talk about, every star counted.
- Billing−13.7%9 of 10 apps
We have not counted the wishes for this market yet.
Searches
Position in Apple’s suggestions1510010203041CountriesChecked. Nothing to show.
Google suggests no wishes for this term.
Traffic
Google Ads, United States, 25 September 2026.
Your test
Free for 7 days
What to call it. Where to launch. What a user costs.
- What to call it
- Where to launch
- What a user costs
- Every review, word for word
No card. Nothing to cancel. The counted page stays free either way.
Is there a market for a new metal detecting app?
19 apps compete here. They hold 64,159 installs on Google Play, counted across the 5 we could match. We hold 235 of their App Store reviews. Those are counts, not a verdict. The page shows what is unfixed, not whether to build.
How much do metal detecting apps charge?
6 of the 6 apps we could check charge inside the app. Half of them start at $4.49 or less. 13 more apps have no price data yet.
What do people search for when they want a metal detecting app?
We scan 41 App Store storefronts. Typing Metal detecting apps completes to “diglog - metal detecting diary” in 30 of them. Then “ground score metal detecting” in 29, “aureal - metal detecting” in 27. These are Apple’s own suggestions. They show what gets typed, not how often.
Cited: What RevenueCat measures across subscription apps
Their report has no category matching Metal detecting apps apps, so only all-category figures are shown. A near-match would be a guess.
the median app barely grows; the tails are extreme
median MRR +5.3% YoY · top decile +306% · bottom decile contracting
the launch flood vs the incumbency moat
~2,000 → 14,700+ new subscription apps per month (Jan 2022 → Jan 2026), yet pre-2020 apps still hold 69% of subscription revenue
even top categories take over 100 days to reach $10k revenue
>100 days to the first $10k
RevenueCat, State of Subscription Apps 2026, 115,000+ apps · $16B+ tracked revenue · >1B transactions. Published industry figures, shown for context; App Imp’s own numbers are counted from reviews and never mixed with these.
How this is counted
We count the reviews we hold again every week. Nothing is guessed. A topic is found by the words a review uses, so the same review always lands in the same place. Every star counts. A share is the part of all reviews here that mention a topic. We compare it with the same share across 14,808 apps on the store, since no one group holds most of these apps. A topic is a gap when at least 20 reviews mention it, at least half the apps have it, and it comes up at least 1.15 times as often as usual. A problem in one app is that app’s bug. A problem in every app is nobody’s gap. This market has no full report yet, so the per-app notes are absent rather than estimated.