Scoring apps
Market
Installs31.6MAcross 5 of 16 apps we could match.
- CricHeroes-Cricket Scoring App: 28,648,937 installs
- Virtual Scoreboard: 2,942,669 installs
- CricÓ: 11,926 installs
- DiamondKast Scoring App: 7,830 installs
- The Score Keeper App: 202 installs
- 91% leader share. CricHeroes-Cricket Scoring App, by Google Play installs, across the 5 of 16 apps we could match
- $1.99 median price. Lowest in-app price, median over the 11 apps that list one. 11 of 12 charge.
- 4 of 16 recently updated. Updated in the 30 days before 2026-10-05
Competition
Scoreboard23 Jun26k ratings$1.99 to $2.99
Virtual Scoreboard21 Sep23k ratings$11.99 a year
Super ScoreboardJun 202512k ratings$9.99 to $19.99
Keep Score9 Sep4k ratings$1.99 to $5.99
Score Keeper for Game Night9 Jun4k ratings$19.99
Darts Scoreboard15 Feb3k ratings$14.99 a year
Scoreboard22 Sep2k ratings$12.99 to $17.99 a year
Point Counter20 Mar984 ratings$0.99
Score Anything8 Apr983 ratings$9.99
CricHeroes-Cricket Scoring App15 Sep688 ratings$12.49 to $24.99 a year
Scoreboard2 Sep365 ratings$49.99 a year
Scorekeeper XLSep 2017248 ratings
DiamondKast Scoring App28 May50 ratings
CricÓ28 Jul22 ratings
The Score Keeper AppMar 20253 ratings
QS Score3 Sep2 ratings
Reviews
What 1,637 reviews talk about, every star counted.
- Ads+15.6%11 of 15 apps
- Wishlist+3.6%12 of 15 apps
- UX−3.6%8 of 15 apps
- Billing−12.7%11 of 15 apps
- Performance−12.7%8 of 15 apps
We have not counted the wishes for this market yet.
Searches
Position in Apple’s suggestions1510010203041CountriesChecked. Nothing to show.
Google suggests no wishes for this term.
Traffic
Google Ads, United States, 10 September 2026.
Your test
Free for 7 days
What to call it. Where to launch. What a user costs.
- What to call it
- Where to launch
- What a user costs
- Every review, word for word
No card. Nothing to cancel. The counted page stays free either way.
Is there a market for a new scoring app?
16 apps compete here. They hold 31,611,564 installs on Google Play, counted across the 5 we could match. We hold 1,637 of their App Store reviews. Those are counts, not a verdict. The page shows what is unfixed, not whether to build.
How much do scoring apps charge?
11 of the 12 apps we could check charge inside the app. Half of them start at $1.99 or less. 4 more apps have no price data yet.
What do people search for when they want a scoring app?
We scan 41 App Store storefronts. Typing Scoring apps completes to “smash-badminton scoring app” in 40 of them. Then “kabaddi stars: live scoring” in 40, “scoring champion” in 36. These are Apple’s own suggestions. They show what gets typed, not how often.
What do users complain about most in scoring apps?
1. Ads: in 11 of 15 apps, 20.9% of reviews (5.3% in Sports apps); 2. Wishlist: in 12 of 15 apps, 11.5% of reviews (7.9% in Sports apps). Counted from 1,637 reviews of every star on the 2026-10-05 snapshot, never estimated.
Cited: What RevenueCat measures across subscription apps
Their report has no category matching Scoring apps apps, so only all-category figures are shown. A near-match would be a guess.
the median app barely grows; the tails are extreme
median MRR +5.3% YoY · top decile +306% · bottom decile contracting
the launch flood vs the incumbency moat
~2,000 → 14,700+ new subscription apps per month (Jan 2022 → Jan 2026), yet pre-2020 apps still hold 69% of subscription revenue
even top categories take over 100 days to reach $10k revenue
>100 days to the first $10k
RevenueCat, State of Subscription Apps 2026, 115,000+ apps · $16B+ tracked revenue · >1B transactions. Published industry figures, shown for context; App Imp’s own numbers are counted from reviews and never mixed with these.
How this is counted
We count the reviews we hold again every week. Nothing is guessed. A topic is found by the words a review uses, so the same review always lands in the same place. Every star counts. A share is the part of all reviews here that mention a topic. We compare it with the same share across 633 Sports apps, the group most of these apps are in. A topic is a gap when at least 20 reviews mention it, at least half the apps have it, and it comes up at least 1.15 times as often as usual. A problem in one app is that app’s bug. A problem in every app is nobody’s gap. This market has no full report yet, so the per-app notes are absent rather than estimated.