Watch billing
elevated · 62.5% of this app’s 32 negative reviews, against 32.1% typical store-wide.
How it compares
- this app
- 62.5%
- 20 of 32
- its shelf
- 35.1%
- rivals only
- store-wide
- 32.1%
- typical
PIXELCELL PTE. LIMITED
4.40star1,941 ratings
Counted from real App Store reviews · 2026-08-24 · nothing estimated or modelled
Read those two together. Ratings are cumulative, reviews are recent — a 4.40star average beside 64% negative is the finding, not an error.
4.5out of 5
1,941 ratings · Apple’s own count, fetched daily
elevated · 62.5% of this app’s 32 negative reviews, against 32.1% typical store-wide.
high · 9.4% of this app’s 32 negative reviews, against 2.8% typical store-wide.
n = 3. Too thin to act on — we recount weekly.
12.5% of this app’s 32 negative reviews, against 11.5% typical store-wide, which is normal for the store.
n = 4. Too thin to act on — we recount weekly.
Performance, Login & auth, Ads all run well below the store’s typical rate.
n = 3. Too thin to act on — we recount weekly.
All 9 panel members · 2026-08-24 snapshot.
| App | Ratings | Billing |
|---|---|---|
| 100,711 | 72.4% | |
| 1,941 | 62.5% | |
| 14,426 | 61.7% | |
| 7,828 | 59.5% | |
| 26,420 | 36.3% | |
| 3,396 | 34.1% | |
| 3,500,732 | 29.1% | |
| 745,472 | 26.8% | |
| 20,703 | 2.4% |
Every complaint across design tools, frequency-ranked from real App Store reviews — the gaps nobody on this shelf has fixed.
Read the design tools reportEvery number is arithmetic over the reviews we hold, re-counted weekly — nothing modelled, nothing scored. Themes come from a frozen pattern classifier rather than a model reading reviews, so the same review always lands in the same bucket. Shares are of this app’s own recent negative reviews; the shelf figure is its rivals with this app excluded. The graded words have fixed cutoffs against the store’s typical rate: elevated from 1.15, high from 2, extreme from 3.5 times it. The page says what is broken and how it compares — never how to fix it, and never whether this app can win.