Investigate ads first
extreme · 49.2% of this app’s 65 negative reviews, against 10.7% typical store-wide.
How it compares
- this app
- 49.2%
- 32 of 65
- its shelf
- 8%
- rivals only
- store-wide
- 10.7%
- typical
Justin Patrick Silang
4.66star8,601 ratings
Counted from real App Store reviews · 2026-08-24 · nothing estimated or modelled
4.5out of 5
8,613 ratings · Apple’s own count, fetched daily
extreme · 49.2% of this app’s 65 negative reviews, against 10.7% typical store-wide.
elevated · 4.6% of this app’s 65 negative reviews, against 2.9% typical store-wide.
n = 3. Too thin to act on — we recount weekly.
elevated · 3.1% of this app’s 65 negative reviews, against 2.2% typical store-wide.
n = 2. Too thin to act on — we recount weekly.
Support, Billing, Performance all run well below the store’s typical rate.
n = 17. Too thin to act on — we recount weekly.
Accuracy is left out — the theme’s vocabulary is in this app’s own name.
All 10 panel members · 2026-08-24 snapshot.
| App | Ratings | Ads |
|---|---|---|
| 8,601 | 49.2% | |
| 16,834 | 16% | |
| 91,093 | 11.5% | |
| 4,502 | 8.7% | |
| 17,687 | 7% | |
| 88,738 | 3.5% | |
| 19,125 | 1.4% | |
| 145,779 | 0.8% | |
| 2,524 | 0% | |
| 2,357 | 0% |
Every complaint across habit tracker app, frequency-ranked from real App Store reviews — the gaps nobody on this shelf has fixed.
Read the habit tracker app reportEvery number is arithmetic over the reviews we hold, re-counted weekly — nothing modelled, nothing scored. Themes come from a frozen pattern classifier rather than a model reading reviews, so the same review always lands in the same bucket. Shares are of this app’s own recent negative reviews; the shelf figure is its rivals with this app excluded. The graded words have fixed cutoffs against the store’s typical rate: elevated from 1.15, high from 2, extreme from 3.5 times it. The page says what is broken and how it compares — never how to fix it, and never whether this app can win.