Watch billing
elevated · 40.5% of this app’s 131 negative reviews, against 32.1% typical store-wide.
How it compares
- this app
- 40.5%
- 53 of 131
- its shelf
- 43.4%
- rivals only
- store-wide
- 32.1%
- typical
Stronger By Science Technologies LLC
4.84star21,211 ratings
Counted from real App Store reviews · 2026-08-24 · nothing estimated or modelled
5.0out of 5
21,322 ratings · Apple’s own count, fetched daily
elevated · 40.5% of this app’s 131 negative reviews, against 32.1% typical store-wide.
high · 6.9% of this app’s 131 negative reviews, against 2.9% typical store-wide.
elevated · 4.6% of this app’s 131 negative reviews, against 2.8% typical store-wide.
Performance, Support, Sync & data all run at or below the store’s typical rate.
Ads, Login & auth all run well below the store’s typical rate.
n = 11. Too thin to act on — we recount weekly.
Accuracy is left out — the theme’s vocabulary is in this app’s own name.
All 10 panel members · 2026-08-24 snapshot.
| App | Ratings | Billing |
|---|---|---|
| 72 | 100% | |
| 53,553 | 67.6% | |
| 358,421 | 59.4% | |
| 37,248 | 59.1% | |
| 773,219 | 42.9% | |
| 162,875 | 41.9% | |
| 21,211 | 40.5% | |
| 150,515 | 37.1% | |
| 96,800 | 25.8% | |
| 2,352,679 | 24.9% |
Every complaint across calorie tracking, frequency-ranked from real App Store reviews — the gaps nobody on this shelf has fixed.
Read the calorie tracking reportEvery number is arithmetic over the reviews we hold, re-counted weekly — nothing modelled, nothing scored. Themes come from a frozen pattern classifier rather than a model reading reviews, so the same review always lands in the same bucket. Shares are of this app’s own recent negative reviews; the shelf figure is its rivals with this app excluded. The graded words have fixed cutoffs against the store’s typical rate: elevated from 1.15, high from 2, extreme from 3.5 times it. The page says what is broken and how it compares — never how to fix it, and never whether this app can win.