Skip to content

Booster for YouTube

Diego Jimenez

3.90star439 ratings

Social NetworkingYoutube channel analytics shelf$0.99–$99.99 · 9 tiersUpdated May 20, 2024
Biggest complaint · Billing
45.2%
19 of 42 negatives · store typical 32.1%
Recent reviews negative
27%
its 9 shelf rivals run 43% · 156 reviews held

Counted from real App Store reviews · 2026-08-24 · nothing estimated or modelled

Booster for YouTube — App Store screenshot
Booster for YouTube — App Store screenshot
Booster for YouTube — App Store screenshot
Booster for YouTube — App Store screenshot

Ratings.

4.0out of 5

439 ratings · Apple’s own count, fetched daily

5star286
4star30
3star15
2star8
1star100

2 decisions.

01

Watch billing

elevated · 45.2% of this app’s 42 negative reviews, against 32.1% typical store-wide.

How it compares
this app
45.2%
19 of 42
its shelf
22.6%
rivals only
store-wide
32.1%
typical
02

Protect ads, support, login & auth and accuracy

Ads, Support, Login & auth, Accuracy all run well below the store’s typical rate.

n = 8. Too thin to act on — we recount weekly.

How it compares
  • Ads2.4% of 42 · shelf 3.6% · store 10.7%
  • Support2.4% of 42 · shelf 5.1% · store 9.2%
  • Login & auth7.1% of 42 · shelf 14.4% · store 13.2%
  • Accuracy7.1% of 42 · shelf 16.8% · store 11.5%

Performance is left out — the theme’s vocabulary is in this app’s own name.

The shelf in numbers

All 10 panel members · 2026-08-24 snapshot.

AppRatingsBilling
AutoTube – Channel Autopilot17245.5%
Booster for YouTube43945.2%
Followers Tracker App3,71043.6%
vidIQ for YouTube & Instagram19,22038.4%
Tracker for YouTube | Creatipi45,02733.3%
Thumbnail Maker: YT Banner Art23,52330.9%
YouTube Studio25,72310.5%
Google Analytics5,2492.9%
StatStory for YouTube Stats4080%
Creator View for YouTube2320%

The whole shelf, counted

Every complaint across youtube channel analytics, frequency-ranked from real App Store reviews — the gaps nobody on this shelf has fixed.

Read the youtube channel analytics report
How this is counted

Every number is arithmetic over the reviews we hold, re-counted weekly — nothing modelled, nothing scored. Themes come from a frozen pattern classifier rather than a model reading reviews, so the same review always lands in the same bucket. Shares are of this app’s own recent negative reviews; the shelf figure is its rivals with this app excluded. The graded words have fixed cutoffs against the store’s typical rate: elevated from 1.15, high from 2, extreme from 3.5 times it. The page says what is broken and how it compares — never how to fix it, and never whether this app can win.