Watch billing
elevated · 45.2% of this app’s 42 negative reviews, against 32.1% typical store-wide.
How it compares
- this app
- 45.2%
- 19 of 42
- its shelf
- 22.6%
- rivals only
- store-wide
- 32.1%
- typical
Diego Jimenez
3.90star439 ratings
Counted from real App Store reviews · 2026-08-24 · nothing estimated or modelled
4.0out of 5
439 ratings · Apple’s own count, fetched daily
elevated · 45.2% of this app’s 42 negative reviews, against 32.1% typical store-wide.
Ads, Support, Login & auth, Accuracy all run well below the store’s typical rate.
n = 8. Too thin to act on — we recount weekly.
Performance is left out — the theme’s vocabulary is in this app’s own name.
All 10 panel members · 2026-08-24 snapshot.
| App | Ratings | Billing |
|---|---|---|
| 172 | 45.5% | |
| 439 | 45.2% | |
| 3,710 | 43.6% | |
| 19,220 | 38.4% | |
| 45,027 | 33.3% | |
| 23,523 | 30.9% | |
| 25,723 | 10.5% | |
| 5,249 | 2.9% | |
| 408 | 0% | |
| 232 | 0% |
Every complaint across youtube channel analytics, frequency-ranked from real App Store reviews — the gaps nobody on this shelf has fixed.
Read the youtube channel analytics reportEvery number is arithmetic over the reviews we hold, re-counted weekly — nothing modelled, nothing scored. Themes come from a frozen pattern classifier rather than a model reading reviews, so the same review always lands in the same bucket. Shares are of this app’s own recent negative reviews; the shelf figure is its rivals with this app excluded. The graded words have fixed cutoffs against the store’s typical rate: elevated from 1.15, high from 2, extreme from 3.5 times it. The page says what is broken and how it compares — never how to fix it, and never whether this app can win.