Watch accuracy
elevated · 16.8% of this app’s 101 negative reviews, against 11.5% typical store-wide.
How it compares
- this app
- 16.8%
- 17 of 101
- its shelf
- 16%
- rivals only
- store-wide
- 11.5%
- typical
Hangzhou DeepSeek Artificial Intelligence Co., Ltd
3.99star11,236 ratings
Counted from real App Store reviews · 2026-08-24 · nothing estimated or modelled
elevated · 16.8% of this app’s 101 negative reviews, against 11.5% typical store-wide.
extreme · 12.9% of this app’s 101 negative reviews, against 2.8% typical store-wide.
1% of this app’s 101 negative reviews, against 32.1% typical store-wide, which is normal for the store.
n = 1. Too thin to act on — we recount weekly.
Support, Performance, Login & auth, UX all run well below the store’s typical rate.
n = 27. Too thin to act on — we recount weekly.
All 9 panel members · 2026-08-24 snapshot.
| App | Ratings | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|
| 245,736 | 23.6% | |
| 498,167 | 19.5% | |
| 11,236 | 16.8% | |
| 1,344,529 | 14.9% | |
| 16,752 | 13.2% | |
| 32,164 | 11.8% | |
| 199,470 | 10.4% | |
| 124,774 | 7.4% | |
| 23,580 | 6.1% |
Every complaint across ai assistants, frequency-ranked from real App Store reviews — the gaps nobody on this shelf has fixed.
Read the ai assistants reportEvery number is arithmetic over the reviews we hold, re-counted weekly — nothing modelled, nothing scored. Themes come from a frozen pattern classifier rather than a model reading reviews, so the same review always lands in the same bucket. Shares are of this app’s own recent negative reviews; the shelf figure is its rivals with this app excluded. The graded words have fixed cutoffs against the store’s typical rate: elevated from 1.15, high from 2, extreme from 3.5 times it. The page says what is broken and how it compares — never how to fix it, and never whether this app can win.