Investigate limits & caps first
extreme · 10.9% of this app’s 46 negative reviews, against 2.8% typical store-wide.
How it compares
- this app
- 10.9%
- 5 of 46
- its shelf
- 6.3%
- rivals only
- store-wide
- 2.8%
- typical
Tuling Network Limited
4.78star7,116 ratings
Counted from real App Store reviews · 2026-08-24 · nothing estimated or modelled
5.0out of 5
7,143 ratings · Apple’s own count, fetched daily
extreme · 10.9% of this app’s 46 negative reviews, against 2.8% typical store-wide.
high · 67.4% of this app’s 46 negative reviews, against 32.1% typical store-wide.
high · 4.3% of this app’s 46 negative reviews, against 2.2% typical store-wide.
n = 2. Too thin to act on — we recount weekly.
17.4% of this app’s 46 negative reviews, against 16.9% typical store-wide, which is normal for the store.
Ads, Support, Accuracy, Login & auth all run well below the store’s typical rate.
n = 11. Too thin to act on — we recount weekly.
All 11 panel members · 2026-08-24 snapshot.
| App | Ratings | Limits & caps |
|---|---|---|
| 74,385 | 13.4% | |
| 7,116 | 10.9% | |
| 6,605 | 10.6% | |
| 8,851 | 9.5% | |
| 14,003 | 3.7% | |
| 4,434 | 3.6% | |
| 89,861 | 3.5% | |
| 3,354 | 3.4% | |
| 11,853 | 1.7% | |
| 6,013 | 1.5% | |
| 12,134 | 0% |
Every complaint across ai meeting notes app, frequency-ranked from real App Store reviews — the gaps nobody on this shelf has fixed.
Read the ai meeting notes app reportEvery number is arithmetic over the reviews we hold, re-counted weekly — nothing modelled, nothing scored. Themes come from a frozen pattern classifier rather than a model reading reviews, so the same review always lands in the same bucket. Shares are of this app’s own recent negative reviews; the shelf figure is its rivals with this app excluded. The graded words have fixed cutoffs against the store’s typical rate: elevated from 1.15, high from 2, extreme from 3.5 times it. The page says what is broken and how it compares — never how to fix it, and never whether this app can win.