Skip to content
App Imp

Twitter analytics and creator growth.

9 apps · 2,176 reviews held · 1,107 negative · 2026-09-02 snapshot

The market’s shape

1.9star
How angry
51%
Negative reviews
59%
Room to enter
8 of 8
Willingness to pay

Mostly solved: ads. 7 of 8 apps run below the store’s typical rate on it, while 9 of 9 still carry billing complaints.

One gap.

Shares of this market’s 1,107 negative reviews.

Billingelevated

35.9% vs 30.8% typical store-wide.

Counted in 397 reviews · 9 of 9 apps · 1.9star mean

What they said · 3 of 397
  • vidIQ for YouTube & Instagram3star· Aug 30, 2026

    One big flaw — You get basically nothing if you don’t pay, and when you do pay for tier one you get a set amount of times you can do things until the next month (when you pay again.) however when you can use it it helps A LOT

  • Followers Analyzer for Twitter1star· Aug 14, 2026

    It’s meh. — It used to let you see all of the people who unfollowed you at the cost of getting an ad when you click on the tab. Now, they censor random users so you have to guess or pay to unblock. It’s a one time purchase that will only give you a certain amount of days to have a full view before you have to pay again.

  • Followers Analyzer for Twitter1star· Aug 13, 2026

    paywall — app used to be so great but now, just like many other apps nowadays, the actually useful features are hidden behind a paywall. extremely disappointing

Named problems · 3
  • Price judged too high for the value27 of 397
  • Trial converted without clear consent11 of 397
  • Charge the user never authorised4 of 397

Also counted

ThemeOf 1,107 negatives
  • Performance164 · 14.8% · 9 apps
  • Login & auth78 · 7.0% · 9 apps
  • Support59 · 5.3% · 6 apps
  • UX36 · 3.3% · 8 apps
  • Ads27 · 2.4% · 8 apps
  • Limits & caps23 · 2.1% · 7 apps
  • Accuracy19 · 1.7% · 6 apps
  • Sync & data8 · 0.7% · 4 apps

The tick marks the store-typical rate. A review can mention more than one theme, so these sum past 100%.

Potential customers

People the apps here do not serve, and what they asked for.

  • Wants lessjust a basic one 23
  • Outgrown itbulk entry 22

Counted in 1 to 4 star reviews. The small numbers are how many reviews named each thing. What they wrote is in the free trial.

Who’s in it

All 9 apps counted in this market · 2026-09-02.

Follow Tool for Twitter is the biggest app here that has stopped shipping. Last update 3 yr 5 mo ago, at 877,312 installs.

Installs are Google's own count, captured 2026-09-06. 2 of 9 apps have an Android listing we could match. A dash means we could not pair the two stores, not that the app is absent from Play. Amber marks an app that has not shipped in over 90 days, the 90th percentile across every market we hold.

What they charge, and what it costs them

Prices from Apple’s public pages; the share counts payment-mechanics language only.

AppMoney complaints
Followers Tracker App$1.99–$59.99 · 10 tiers13.6% of 110
Go Viral: AI Creator Assistant$9.99–$49.99 · 5 tiers8.9% of 45
InsTrack for Instagram$4.99–$46.99 · 4 tiers3.5% of 340
Who Unfollowed Me on X Twitter$7.99–$999.99 · 9 tiers3% of 165
Tracker for YouTube | Creatipi$2.99–$59.99 · 8 tiers0% of 11
Buffer: Plan & Schedule Posts$5.99–$144.99 · 9 tiers0% of 206
vidIQ for YouTube & Instagram$8.99–$199 · 10 tiers0% of 101
Followers Analyzer for Twitter$4.99–$12.99 · 2 tiers0% of 34

What each one owns, where each is exposed

Social Network Analyzer

Owns. Early mover, broadest IAP tier ladder (10 tiers, up to $14.99)

Exposed. 89% negative — the most hated app in the set; data stops updating, strangers/friends tabs go blank, support never responds, paid access randomly revoked; rating_count 406 signals limited reach but concentrated fury

Go Viral: AI Creator Assistant

Owns. AI-framed positioning, meaningful reach (rating_count 1,704), IAP up to $49.99

Exposed. 75% negative; AI feedback called generic and wrong even on confirmed viral videos — accuracy failure at the product's core claim

ReelTrends - AI Creator Tools

Owns. Largest reach in the set (rating_count 20,011), broad IAP range ($2.99–$59.99, 9 tiers)

Exposed. 55% negative; near-total instant paywall with no free preview drives mass uninstalls; billing rage dominates receipts

Followers Tracker App

Owns. Solid reach (rating_count 3,709), wide IAP ceiling ($139.99)

Exposed. 54% negative; crashes on core workflows, fabricated posting-time recommendations, 404 support page — pays-then-breaks pattern

InsTrack for Instagram

Owns. Established user base (rating_count 824), no IAP friction (null tiers)

Exposed. 57% negative; removed the key 'unfollowed' feature that drove downloads, inaccurate premium data packs — feature regression as monetization

vidIQ for YouTube & Instagram

Owns. Second-largest reach (rating_count 18,849), proven subscription model ($8.99–$199, 10 tiers), only 24% negative

Exposed. Category benchmark — low anger means it has mostly solved billing and UX; the opening is NOT here, but its model proves high-ticket creator subscriptions work

Followers Analyzer for Twitter

Owns. Lowest anger in IAP-free tier (11% negative), meaningful reach (rating_count 1,724)

Exposed. No IAP — leaves monetization entirely on the table; limited feature depth likely explains low anger

Luvi (formerly Club)

Owns. Largest reach outside ReelTrends/vidIQ (rating_count 18,734), 7% negative — happiest user base

Exposed. Creator monetization/payout focus, not analytics — different job-to-be-done; payout delay and 40% manual-payout fee revealed in receipts

Follow Tool for Twitter

Owns. 26% negative, Twitter-native focus

Exposed. Fetch errors render core unfollow function broken; no IAP means no demonstrated monetization path here

Mysocial: AI Creator Manager

Owns. Widest IAP ceiling in the set ($199.99), multi-platform framing

Exposed. 60% negative on only 15 captured reviews (rating_count 186) — too small to read reliably, but highest price ceiling with lowest reach is a concerning ratio

The Deep Report on this market

Each rival’s exposed weakness, what not to build, and the call, argued from the same reviews counted above.

Read the Deep Report

Browse the apps behind these counts

Every app we count, with the complaint it runs furthest above the store’s typical rate.

Open the app library

Is there a market for a new twitter analytics and creator growth app?

9 apps compete on this shelf, holding 2,176 App Store reviews. And the widest unfixed complaint, billing, runs in 9 of 9 of them at 35.9% of negative reviews against 30.8% typical. Those are counts, not a verdict. The page shows what is unfixed, not whether to build.

What do users complain about most in twitter analytics and creator growth?

1. Billing: in 9 of 9 apps, 35.9% of negative reviews.

How many twitter analytics and creator growth app reviews did App Imp count?

2,176 US App Store reviews across 9 apps, 1,107 of them negative. Counted on the 2026-09-02 snapshot, never estimated.

How markets are ranked

We give each market a mark out of 100 for seven things (nobody's fixed it 20 · above the norm 15 · how angry 10 · room to build 15 · room to enter 15 · getting bigger 20 · willingness to pay 5). Then we multiply the marks together. We do not average them.

Averaging lets a market hide one bad problem behind good numbers. Multiplying means one bad mark pulls the whole score down. That is the point. A market you cannot win is still a market you cannot win, however badly it is served.

Each mark has a fixed rule. Nobody’s fixed it and willingness to pay are plain shares. Above the norm maxes out at 4 times the store’s usual rate. How angry runs from star3.0 down to star1.5. Room to enter is what the biggest app does not own. Getting bigger hits 100 at 10% growth. Room to build is different. It is a sweet spot, not a size. A market can be too small to live on, or too big to break into.

If we cannot count something, we leave it out. We never guess it. The score only sorts this list. Every other number you see on a market is counted.

How this is counted

Every number is arithmetic over the reviews we hold, re-counted weekly: nothing modelled, nothing scored. Themes come from a frozen pattern classifier rather than a model reading reviews, so the same review always lands in the same bucket. A market rate is pooled across every app here; the store rate is the same count across 12,728 apps. A complaint is only called a gap when at least half the market carries it, at least 20 reviews are behind it, and the market’s rate is elevated above the store’s, the same cutoff used everywhere on this site, because a problem concentrated in one app is that app’s bug, and a problem every app on the store shares is nobody’s gap.