Investigate billing first
high · 67.6% of this app’s 349 negative reviews, against 32.1% typical store-wide.
How it compares
- this app
- 67.6%
- 236 of 349
- its shelf
- 39.9%
- rivals only
- store-wide
- 32.1%
- typical
REFACE LITHUANIA UAB
4.66star53,553 ratings
Counted from real App Store reviews · 2026-08-24 · nothing estimated or modelled
Read those two together. Ratings are cumulative, reviews are recent — a 4.66star average beside 40% negative is the finding, not an error.
high · 67.6% of this app’s 349 negative reviews, against 32.1% typical store-wide.
elevated · 14.3% of this app’s 349 negative reviews, against 9.2% typical store-wide.
elevated · 19.5% of this app’s 349 negative reviews, against 13.2% typical store-wide.
UX, Limits & caps, Sync & data all run at or below the store’s typical rate.
Performance, Ads all run well below the store’s typical rate.
Accuracy is left out — the theme’s vocabulary is in this app’s own name.
All 10 panel members · 2026-08-24 snapshot.
| App | Ratings | Billing |
|---|---|---|
| 72 | 100% | |
| 53,553 | 67.6% | |
| 358,421 | 59.4% | |
| 37,248 | 59.1% | |
| 773,219 | 42.9% | |
| 162,875 | 41.9% | |
| 21,211 | 40.5% | |
| 150,515 | 37.1% | |
| 96,800 | 25.8% | |
| 2,352,679 | 24.9% |
Every complaint across calorie tracking, frequency-ranked from real App Store reviews — the gaps nobody on this shelf has fixed.
Read the calorie tracking reportEvery number is arithmetic over the reviews we hold, re-counted weekly — nothing modelled, nothing scored. Themes come from a frozen pattern classifier rather than a model reading reviews, so the same review always lands in the same bucket. Shares are of this app’s own recent negative reviews; the shelf figure is its rivals with this app excluded. The graded words have fixed cutoffs against the store’s typical rate: elevated from 1.15, high from 2, extreme from 3.5 times it. The page says what is broken and how it compares — never how to fix it, and never whether this app can win.